
I don't understand the advertising angle, let alone the timeline and I'm a little late to mount the moral high-horse, feminist bloggers in the US are taking up
Which is a completely accurate statement excepting for the exceptions that "just" here has the unique definition of "last year" and "new product" can be more accurately defined in this situation as "not really new at all, just not sold in America". Oh, and it also shakes out that Bacardi did not sponsor or develop the ad in any way, shape or form. From Bacardi's second official response to the backlash against the ad (text of the first response can be found here):
"...what we do know is that a third-party developed and activated this brief campaign in one small market more than a year ago without our clearance."
For those of you who are confused then about why feminist bloggers are howling with fresh indignation towards this week and calling for the blood of the company that allegedly ran the ad campaign (which has been defunct for close to a year now...), the chronology of the response is as follows:
For those of you who are confused then about why feminist bloggers are howling with fresh indignation towards this week and calling for the blood of the company that allegedly ran the ad campaign (which has been defunct for close to a year now...), the chronology of the response is as follows:
1. May-June 2008 (Israel): A third-party advertiser runs the Find an Ugly Girlfriend Ad in a small market without Bacardi's knowledge or blessing. Israelis chuckle, product sells, summer rolls along and the ads are forgotten about.
2. ...
3. June 2009 (Israel): An independent agency reposts the ad campaign online, once again without Bacardi's authorization. Bacardi- as a corporation- is never directly linked to the ad, but their brand image most certainly is.
4. Bloggers get their hooks in the fodder, fail to check sources thoroughly, and the ascii hits the fan!
Outside of the issue of the baffling delay in this response is the fact that these advertisements are nowhere near as misogynistic as other sexy alcohol advertisements that are out there. If anything, the decision to use decidedly less-than-pulchritudinous women to sell booze should be seen as an affirmation of equality since these unattractive models are (hopefully...) not being viewed merely as sexual objects plying their bodies to sell (c)hooch.
No, loyal readers, these ads have real women in them and don't reduce the female form to a pair of horribly airbrushed thighs, a perky pair of amazing, gravity-defying, supple breasts and an amazingly perky, be-thonged ass that could deflect a bullet in an attempt to prey on man's baser nature in an attempt to turn a profit- these women have something to offer!
